Science Magic and Religion, the complete 20 lecture class taught at UCLA

CLICK the Youtube link to get started:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K3Zx-qcNZf4&index=1&list=PLFFD1C791A86FB485&spfreload=5

A fun learning experience presented by a gifted UCLA Professor.

Which word does not apply here? Liar. Cheat. Murder. Clinton. Tooth fairy.

Aw, shucks. You guessed it.  It would be CLINTON. Because Clinton is like The Holy Name of America.
Is it even conceivable in the History of Television that the words, Clinton, Liar, Cheat, Murder would ever be connected? NO waaaaay!  That would have to be BALONEY! BUNKUM! SPUTUM!

Presidents of America do not lie!
Governors do. We know. Not Presidents! What would other countries think?
And First American Ladies don't. Think Nancy Reagan. Would Nancy Reagan lie?
Or would a Secretary of State lie? Think Thomas Jefferson, James Madison, Henry Kissinger.
Back to Presidents. Think Abe Lincoln. Ronnie Reagan. Think Nixon. Bushies?

I won't go on. This is making me sick.

dh


      

Did Jesus ever say, "I am God"?

Nope. 


Preacherdouble-talk.  

Joel is the Master at Double-talk. SEE FOR YOURSELF.

Politicians do it.

From Steve Benen, "Trump question leaves House Republican stumbling", MSNBC 2/11/16, the most spectacularly disfluent interview segment that I've ever heard: 0:20 

Supreme Court Justices do it

SCALIA ON THE MEANING OF MEANING

In the November issue of First Things, Justice Antonin Scalia has a review of Law’s Quandary by Steven D. Smith. One of the review's central issues is the meaning of meaning. Scalia writes that

The portion of Smith’s book I least understand—or most disagree with—is the assertion, upon which a regrettably large portion of the analysis depends, that it is a “basic ontological proposition that persons, not objects, have the property of being able to mean.” “Textual meaning,” Smith says, “must be identified with the semantic intentions of an author—and . . . without an at least tacit reference to an author we would not have a meaningful text at all, but rather a set of meaningless marks or sounds.” “Legal meaning depends on the (semantic) intentions of an author.”

"Scalia on the meaning of meaning", 10/29/2005
"Is marriage similar or identical to itself?", 11/2/2005
"A result that no sensible person could have intended", 12/8/2005
"Everything is too appropriate these days", 4/5/2006
"Scalia's 'buddy-buddy' contractions", 5/12/2008
"The meaning of meaning: Fish v. Scalia", 1/4/2011
"Justice Breyer, Professor Austin, and the Meaning of 'Any'", 7/6/2011
"Scalia and Garner on legal interpretation", 7/17/2012
"Scalia's argle-bargle", 6/27/2013
"What did Justice Scalia mean?", 10/7/2013
"Antonin and Beppe", 3/4/2014


 

INSTAGRAM of FAKE Paul McCartney at 2016 Grammy Party

FAKE Paul McCartney is seen at a 2016 GRAMMY PARTY. Here is the photograph:

FAKE, FAKE, FAKE if I ever saw one. He died long before this. People have been lying about this since before I was even BORN!  Read more at TMZ !  

True! Paul is Dead. Lie! Paul is Dead